Pensive Saturday.

Today was a general clean-up day. Lots of trash made it to the dumpster, the kitty boxes got cleaned again, several loads of laundry were pushed through the machines (I feel like TraumaMama, the Goddess of Laundry), a load of dishes were washed, and filing done with an eye to tax returns. Thank the Powers The Be for H&R Block. There’s no way I want to even think about dealing with last year’s mess.

All this manual labor left my brain free to think, which is usually a dangerous thing. It certainly was today. I find that quantity of thought time means a loss of quality of thought. Ah well.

Yesterday I was challenged by someone to defend a decision I made months ago. It really doesn’t matter what the decision was at this point, or why I decided to act on things a certain way. What bothers me is that this person felt that they had a right to know why I came to this decision. The decision affected them somewhat, so I suppose they felt justified in demanding an explanation. But the information I based the decision on was confidential. Which should win out … right to know, or confidentiality?

In the end, I punted. I explained what I could, leaving out what I couldn’t say. The other person was less than satisfied, and I probably would have done better not to try and justify myself at all. That is a take-home lesson I shall try to remember next time such a situation comes up, if it ever does.

In a related issue (though it may not be obvious how this could be related) I spent some time thinking on how groups of friends form. What is it that makes you want to have one person as a friend, while you want to cross the street and hide in a doorway when you see another person coming your way? Mutual interests, compatible dispositions, the ability to listen and understand, a congenial nature, ability to trust: these are often given as the foundations for friendship. As often as not though you’ll find fast friends who share few of these items. Other times people who seem as though they’d make good friends who despise each other. I’m still pondering this one, but I think that friendship is so interlaced with personal needs that you’d never be able to tease the two apart. And, as no two people have the same identical needs, no two people will have the same basis for what they call friendship.

So for me, I guess friendship is like art. I don’t necesarily know how to define it, but I know it when I see it. And while I’d like all the answers to life, the universe and everything before I die, I figure it’s enough that I know life, the universe and everything when I see it. The rest is just details.

I suppose that’s why Douglas Adams, rest his spirit, correctly arrived at 42 as “the answer to life, the universe and everything”. If the question doesn’t make any sense, neither should the answer.

With that, I think it’s time to go to bed and rest my overtaxed brain cells.

Similar Posts

4 Comments

  1. aka Goddess of Laundry…LOL, I like that! Too bad it is true, I am still trying to get todays done.

    I like what you said about friendship being a bit like art, you know it when you see it.

    I have been in a position similar to yours regarding decisions and confidentality, it’s not fun.

  2. Well, as you’ve noticed, I hang around with a lot of people who are not my friends, a phenomenon that seems largely–but not entirely–related to motherhood. I think it’s more to do with compatible dispositions than anything else. But maybe that’s because of my disposition. I get along with people who are dissimilar to me because I’m generally interested in a wide variety of things. Perhaps to somebody who was close-minded, compatible dispositions could be the death-knell to a friendship. They need an opposite. I don’t know.

    Seems like 42 is a good answer after all.

  3. I think this is a good entry, and so true Pali.

    Friendship, as strong as it is between two people, is so fragile in reality. Yes…friendship is in a way a form of art. Always viewed by people in so many different ways.

    ck

  4. Wait, who’s Douglas Adams?? I knew the answer to the universe was 42, but, but, but… I thought it was a joke. Well actually it probably still is. Years ago we played Trivial Pursuit with someone who answered 42 whenever they didn’t know the answer…the crazy thing is…some of the answers really were 42…or heck…maybe it was a question on the game. Oh I am soooo confused… but to this day, if I don’t know an answer in Trivial Pursuit I say 42. We won’t say how often I use that answer…eh hem…

    ~QE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *